Now that we've discussed some of the general reasons why the College Board might have decided to implement the adversity score, we're going to move on to going over specific positive and negative aspects of the program.Although it's easy to dismiss as pointless or silly, the SAT adversity score does have some positive features.Just because the College Board provides this data to colleges doesn't mean that admissions officers have to take it into account.Tags: How To Be Critical In Essay WritingFavourite Tv Programs EssayExample Of Term Paper OutlineEssay On Eating DisordersCathedral By Raymond Carver Essay PapersVg Wort DissertationWhat Is An Abstract In A Research PaperEssay For Life In The City
As per the College Board, the Environmental Context Dashboard (including adversity scores) was first used in a pilot study of 50 schools 2018-2019, with expansion to 150 schools planned for Fall 2019 and a more widespread release in the following year.
Specific schools named as having had access to the adversity score for this past year's admission cycle include Florida State University, University of Michigan, Trinity, and Yale.
This is not the first time the College Board or the SAT's creator ETS has tried to contextualize SAT scores for colleges.
According to the Wall Street Journal, one attempt to do this happened in the early 1990s, when Winton Manning (an ETS researcher) worked on creating a modified SAT score that took "background factors" into account called the Measure of Academic Talent.
In 2019, it's not entirely surprising that the College Board is yet again trying out the idea that they should give more information to colleges about SAT test takers than just a single test score.
As more and more colleges are becoming test-optional or test-flexible and events like the recent college admissions scandal and the more regular SAT/ACT cheating scandals continue to occur, it makes sense that the College Board would want to give colleges a reason to continue using the SAT as part of college admissions.However, these reports don't really get into more complicated effects of how multiple factors interact (e.g.gender, household income, and highest level of parental education achieved), likely because it is difficult to explain these interactions and because the effects might not reach statistical significance.Last Thursday, the College Board announced via the Wall Street Journal that it has been testing out a project where, along with students' SAT scores, colleges see each student's "Overall Disadvantage Level," or their "adversity score." In this article, we'll go over what we know so far about the adversity score and how it might affect college admissions.We'll also give some tips on how to limit what information about you the College Board can use to calculate your adversity score.In contrast to the initial reporting from the Wall Street Journal, the adversity score does take things like whether test-takers are English Language Learners or have differing AP opportunities into account.The following information is included on the Environmental Context Dashboard but is *As of this article's publication, it's not entirely clear how the College Board is calculating things like "percentage of housing units that are vacant" for test-takers' high school environments (since in general, teachers do not actually live in schools).Through the Wall Street Journal, ETS announced that it was creating a program called Strivers, which would identify students whose actual SAT score exceeded their expected SAT score by 200 points or more as strivers.This expected SAT score was calculated using "14 different categories, including family income, parents' education level and high-school socioeconomic mix" (Wall Street Journal). ) After public outcry, ETS decided not to go forward with the Strivers program in 1999.We'll keep this article updated as new information comes out on the adversity score, so be sure to check back periodically.The SAT adversity score, also known as a student's Overall Disadvantage Level, is a number that the College Board calculates from information it has about different aspects of an SAT test taker's life about the disadvantages they've faced.