University of Wisconsin-Madison psychology professor Janet Hyde was part of a team which reviewed 184 single-gender education studies earlier this year.Hyde is also the director of research for a national co-education advocacy group.Tags: Do Good Outline Research PaperDirections For Writing A Narrative EssayEnglish Language And Gender EssayGenetically Modified Foods EssayEssays On The Origins Of The Cold WarAqa Gcse Media Coursework Mark SchemeEssay On Energy Crisis EnglishEssays Or HoarsesDescription Of English Essays Letter WritingDorian Grey Essays
In the best-designed studies, Hyde found no evidence students benefit from single-gender education across 14 outcomes, including math performance, self-esteem, attitudes about math and science and more.
“Often it will work in the first year,” Hyde said, “because everybody’s enthusiastic about it. But after the first year, when the novelty wears off, it doesn’t really produce any benefits.” The programs are also expensive and can cause logistical problems, Hyde said, because districts must offer three versions of every class: for males, females and both sexes.
So, many studies have trouble accounting for factors such as parents who choose single-gender programs might be more likely to be involved in their kids’ education.
Other studies compared single-gender private schools, whose students are more likely to be wealthy, to co-educational public schools. The acronym stands for Extraordinary Ambitious Gentlemen Leading in Excellence.
A 2012 study looked at South Korea schools, where students are randomly assigned to single-gender and co-educational schools. There is no research showing students in single-gender programs perform worse than mixed-gender peers. “Overall there’s some positive findings in the research,” said Sara Mead, a policy analyst with D.
That study found single-gender graduates were more likely to attend a four-year college. Piechura-Couture says parents should have the choice of single-gender classes, even if research can’t prove an advantage. “If there’s no difference between the two,” Hyde said, “then we really — to avoid sex discrimination — need to use co-ed classes.” Other studies have concluded more research is needed on the long-term benefits of single-gender education, such as a 2005 report by the American Institutes for Research for the U. C.-based Bellwether Education Partners, “but it’s really mixed and overall there’s not a lot of really high-quality research.” Want to know what the students think?“We find that single-sex schools produce a higher percentage of graduates who attended four-year colleges and a lower percentage of graduates who attended two-year junior colleges than do coeducational schools,” the study’s authors wrote. We spoke with students in single-gender programs in Tallahassee and Tampa in January.“The positive effects of single-sex schools remain substantial, even after we take into account various school-level variables, such as teacher quality, the student-teacher ratio, the proportion of students receiving lunch support, and whether the schools are public or private.” Gina Jordan/State Impact Florida These boys are part of the All Male E. That can be difficult for smaller school districts.Stetson University education professor Kathy Piechura-Couture has been advising single-gender programs at Woodward Avenue Elementary in Deland and is on the board of a national single-gender education advocacy group.Surprisingly, its roots are discriminatory: in colonial times, boys were taught science, writing, and arithmetic while girls were only taught how to cook and sew. congress enacted Title IX of the Higher Education Act, a federal mandate that demanded schools treat students equally, regardless of race or gender. This is a major reason why single-gender schooling has such a negative perception associated with it. This law forced hundreds of public single-sex schools to close their doors…... The results are mixed, as is often the case in education research.Two large reviews of single-gender education research found little evidence that boys and girls do better in school, long-term, if they are separated.One of the problems with researching single-gender education — which Piechura-Couture concedes– is that it is difficult to design scientifically-sound studies.Schools can’t randomly assign students to single-gender classes because the law says the programs must be voluntary.