The claim was made because the defendant did not see the plaintiff car coming and try to evade.
The claim was made because the defendant did not see the plaintiff car coming and try to evade.Tags: Quote Authors Research PaperProblem Solving Using EquationsScience Fair Introduction PaperBeauty Salon Business Plan TemplateBreakfast Restaurant Business PlanOutlining A Research PaperEssay Writing ImagesSymbols Proofreading Essay
He answered negatively but he was a little bit confused.
At the end of the trial the judge summarised all the evidence and facts from the beginning and gave his final judgement that the incident’s costs will be divided into fifty percent to each and the trial’s costs would be paid by the defendant.
After the defendants examination his father in law came in for a witness statement as he was the co-driver at the time of the incident.
The judge and the plaintiff’s party tried to find out if the defendant and his father in law had ever again talked about the incident or just the evidence.
On the left side was the defendant with his Barrister in front him.
At first the claimant went to the witness stand in order to be examined by both parties.The layout of the courtroom was simple there was no raised layers except from the judge’s.Also there was not defendant’s box and no presence of police.As a have seen from my visit to the County Court one possible fact that may discourage the parties from claiming is the much questioning and cross-examination that they have to pass through.Cases in the County Court can be very comprehensible to lay persons.He tried to avoid her but having only seconds to react he did not manage to avoid her.At that point the claimant’s barrister insisted that he passed illegally from the Pelican crossing few metres away from the incident. Also another important argument was that on the witness statement the defendant said that he broke his leg but afterwards the doctor said that he had also damaged his lower back.Before attending, each court was contacted in order to find out the times and cases that could be attended as some cases such as youth cases are not open to the public.Firstly I attended to the Manchester Civil Justice Centre. After some guidance from the people there I attended to court 20 of the fifth floor which there was a civil case about a car incident.The judge was a middle-aged, middle-class, white male. The case I have heard was about a car incidence, as I mentioned above.This case included a claim from the one party and a counter claim from the other.