Diversity A 21 century studio culture must take on a more inclusive understanding of knowledge practices if it is to serve a globalized community.The dominant studio model traces its lineage back to Euro-American precedents like the Beaux Arts, the Bauhaus, and, in the US, the Texas Rangers, but these are inadequate even in an American context, where a large portion of architecture students identify themselves as “international”.
Diversity A 21 century studio culture must take on a more inclusive understanding of knowledge practices if it is to serve a globalized community.Tags: Essay On Poverty In Pakistan 2013Write Essay 13 ColoniesEssay Gender Equality In PakistanLaser Tag Business PlanArgumentative Essay On RacismShort Essay On Dignity6 Steps In Problem SolvingComponents Of Culture EssayAlchemist By Coelho Critical Essay Novel Paul
But why should a student from China, for example, be heavily invested in the work of Andrea Palladio or Peter Eisenman?
These are certainly valid and well-supported models, but they should be considered just a few among many.
Flexibility While the architecture studio is still a site for a range of creative transactions, the ways in which students work are often informed by inherited constraining habits.
As educators, we teach students to be nimble thinkers and designers, moving between various digital platforms, modeling and mapping software, and honing their public presentation personas.
It also affects the health and wellness of students.
Over ten years ago, the AIAS (American Institute of Architecture Students) and NAAB (National Architectural Accrediting Board) created a new requirement for accreditation, requiring all schools to address these precise concerns through a written policy on studio and learning culture.Balance A recent study on mental health in architecture school paints a bleak picture of the experience of studio culture.The idea that “all-nighters” are a necessary part of any project work schedule is an accepted and often expected practice.The NAAB Handbook is quite clear in its support of a balanced life, however the advice is habitually ignored.Architects from Virtruvius to Le Corbusier have claimed to hold the responsibility of teaching society how to live productive, artful lives.We believe there is an urgent need to reconfigure the institution of studio in order to address the pressing academic and professional issues of our time.We are putting forth what we feel are the guiding principles which must inform a progressive studio culture: agency, balance, flexibility, diversity, interactivity, interdisciplinarity, and sustainability.In a posthumous 1990 essay “A Black Box: The Secret Profession of Architecture”, Reyner Banham warned of architecture’s corrosive trend toward insulating itself from discussions outside of the discipline.Decades later, architecture finds itself in an even more dire state of affairs.But what does it mean to be flexible when it comes to life-work balance?And more importantly, how do students learn to be flexible?