Tags: Drowning Incident EssayReview LiteratureTeleological Argument EssayQuotes In A Essay How To CiteResearch Paper Artificial IntelligenceWriting Numbers In EssaysWomen Scientist EssaysThesis Obesity Binge Eating DisorderBest Nonfiction Essays Of All TimeThe Cons Of Homework
First, this punishment is analysed from a purely utilitarian perspective in an effort to find out whether application of capital punishment really helps to deter crime and reduce the risk of recidivism, when criminals commit repeated crimes.The evidence for this is sought in crime rates in regions and nations where executions are carried out.
This is analogous to penalties imposed for instance for robbery or theft - the criminal often has to forfeit one's possessions for taking the property of another person.
Similarly, it is fair that one who has consciously taken the life of another person should suffer death.
Political crimes should not be punished with death either, as this would open the way to political repression and physical elimination of political rivals, as it happened in Stalin's times in the Soviet Union.
However, when a person murders another person, death is the right kind of retribution.
Background The history of death penalty is almost as old as the history of mankind.
Various means of capital punishment involved burning, hanging, drowning, crucifixion, breaking on the will, boiling to death, electrocution, firing squad, gassing - the list can be continued.
The French Revolution introduced a more humane execution method, the guillotine that cut off the heads of the condemned.
The first decision to abolish capital punishment was made by the Grand Duke Leopold II of Habsburg in Granducato di Toscana (Tuscany) on 30 November 1786.
Thus, the support for death penalty surges in nations where especially outrageous murders take place.
On the contrary, a lower criminal rate reduces the support.